What could happen to morning travel times?

Comparing today’s transit service to a scenario with a 35% reduction reveals a troubling yet not unexpected shift in access: many neighborhoods within the City of Pittsburgh and the vast majority of communities throughout Allegheny County would face bus or light rail travel times exceeding 40 minutes to reach Downtown and Oakland. For many commuters, a transit trip that long becomes impractical, pushing more people into private vehicles. The result would likely be a surge in car traffic on already congested corridors like the Parkway East, Parkway West, Route 28, and Boulevard of the Allies. Local streets in neighborhoods such as Oakland, the Strip District, and the North Shore would feel the strain, too.

Streets and parking infrastructure in Downtown and Oakland are not built to absorb this sudden influx. With parking garages near capacity under current conditions, more drivers would mean longer searches for parking, increased double-parking and gridlock, and diminished air quality due to idling vehicles. The ripple effects could be felt across the region: longer commute times, less predictable travel for delivery and service vehicles, and a Downtown and Oakland that’s harder to access for workers, visitors, and businesses alike.

A 35% transit service cut wouldn’t just affect those who ride the bus or light rail, it would change how the entire region moves.

Downtown

Use the slider below to see how morning travel times times would change with the proposed 35% service cut:

Current Service: A map showing travel times to Downtown with current service, as of 2025. -35% Scenario: A map showing travel times to Downtown under the 35% service cut proposal.

Oakland

Use the slider below to see how morning travel times times would change with the proposed 35% service cut:

Current Service: A map showing travel times to Oakland with current service, as of 2025. -35% Scenario: A map showing travel times to Oakland under the 35% service cut proposal.

North Side

Use the slider below to see how morning travel times times would change with the proposed 35% service cut:

Current Service: A map showing travel times to the North Side with current service, as of 2025. -35% Scenario: A map showing travel times to the North Side under the 35% service cut proposal.

Strip District

Use the slider below to see how morning travel times times would change with the proposed 35% service cut:

Current Service: A map showing travel times to the Strip District with current service, as of 2025. -35% Scenario: A map showing travel times to the Strip District under the 35% service cut proposal.

Shadyside

Use the slider below to see how morning travel times times would change with the proposed 35% service cut:

Current Service: A map showing travel times to Shadyside with current service, as of 2025. -35% Scenario: A map showing travel times to Shadyside under the 35% service cut proposal.

Squirrel Hill

Use the slider below to see how morning travel times times would change with the proposed 35% service cut:

Current Service: A map showing travel times to Squirrel Hill with current service, as of 2025. -35% Scenario: A map showing travel times to Squirrel Hill under the 35% service cut proposal.

South Side

Use the slider below to see how morning travel times times would change with the proposed 35% service cut:

Current Service: A map showing travel times to the South Side with current service, as of 2025. -35% Scenario: A map showing travel times to the South Side under the 35% service cut proposal.

Who can walk to transit?

PRT uses the best available sidewalk data from the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) to estimate the areas that are within a quarter mile or 5 minute walk to transit -- the time that research shows most people find reasonable. Comparing the areas that were within a 5 minute walk to transit in 2008 through today highlights the losses the system and our region have experienced due to past budget cuts and what might come next if a 35% reduction in service results from a lack of state funding.